Jan 23, 2013

Does Talent Matter? How the Idea of Talent Saved and Sabotaged Me


I’m sitting in my fourth grade classroom, picking at a bit of dried glue on my desk. Across from me is Matt, a tall skater boy who belongs to the popular-kid posse but bent the Cool Rules enough to help me with long division. He's gone back to being surly now. Across the room, someone giggles.

Our desks are arranged in four-desk pods, and the giggle came from the one diagonally across from mine. Two boys crumble bits of their eraser and throw it at Jess, taking advantage of Mr. P’s turned back. Jess’s head is bowed, blonde hair falling over her glasses as she tries to ignore them.

“Pick your nose!” one of them says in a carrying whisper. He shifts his wicked glare from Jess to me, challenging my temper.

Tears drop onto the stiff, glittery face of the Siberian tiger on Jess's shirt, and I go hot with anger. I clench my teeth and glare back down at my desk. I want to yell at them, but if I do I’ll only cry, and if I cry I’ll probably get in trouble for being so easily provoked.

I’m always easily provoked. I am, as my grandfather would say, pugnacious. After a while, though, you either fight back or shut down, and I’m years from shutting down.

Mr. P finishes pulling our composition books from the file cabinet and gives the boys a look. He’s the nicest teacher I’ve ever had, but I wish he’d let me and Jess sit together. He can’t, really. The desks are alphabetical, and despite our names both starting with “Har-”, the luck of the numbers has us sitting half a classroom apart. My desk is closest to the door. I can’t wait to get out of here.

Mr. P hands out the composition notebooks, and after yesterday’s class, my face is still burning. I wish Jess hadn’t raised her hand to read her story. It had been about us watching a spaceship landing and being ecstatic when some of our favorite fictional characters stepped out. She cried “Luke Skywalker!?” and I cried out “Ben!?”

My childhood love.
She’d meant the intrepid apprentice from the American Girl series about Felicity, but there was a boy in the class named Ben—one of the popular boys—and they were all now convinced I had a crush on him. I’d rather date the apprentice, who has dark reddish hair that matches his stubborn, fiery personality. Jess knows my taste pretty well. That’s why we’re friends.

I slide my composition book toward me and open it, letting myself fall back into the story of kidnapped golden foxes and the young girl who rides off to find them and save her village. I’m glad Mr. P has us writing stories. He reads to us too, and pairs us off to read books together so we can talk about them. I flush, remembering he assigned me to read a book with Ben a few weeks ago. Ben was nice, and never said anything bad about me like the other boys did.

He wasn’t brave either, though. He laughed when they said mean things and never tried to stop them. I remember him standing there when A.J. spat in my Young Jedi Knights book, and when Josh “accidentally” hit me in the face with a basketball. Never mind. Ben isn’t nice. Ben is scared.

Instead of thinking about it, I disappear into my story, imagining the thud of hooves and the warm little crate where the golden foxes are held, deep inside a cave covered in twisting vines. I don’t come out again until Mr. P crouches next to me, his hands on my desk for balance. Mr. P is young—he has long, curly hair he wears back in a ponytail and glasses. He drives a motorcycle to school and is engaged to the art teacher.

“Lauren,” he says, already smiling. “I read your story so far and it’s really good. Have you ever thought about becoming a writer?”

I know people write books, but they’ve always been distant, mythical beings as rare and magical as pegacorns. They’re Authors. I love making up stories but I didn’t think anyone would like reading them. Mr. P said my fox story was good, though, and he’s a teacher.

I don’t look around. I don’t want to see my classmates, whether they’re looking or not. Mr. P hadn’t crouched down at any other desks. Only mine. I feel strangely triumphant all of a sudden. I’m a horse-loving bookworm and a Jedi-wannabe; I make myself an easy target because I try to be like the heroines in my favorite books and stand up for other people.

But I have talent.

Have you ever thought about becoming a writer?

“Yes.” It was almost a lie, since I never though about it before now, but I don’t want to lose hold of this new possibility blooming inside me, quietly pushing back the dread. “That’s what I want to do.”



Does Talent Matter?

I was bullied from fourth to eighth grade and books had always been a solace for me, as they are for so many. When I found out I could write them, I knew it was what I wanted to do for the rest of my life.

But what does talent really mean, and does it really matter? Its impact on my life has been both positive and negative, because as much as talent itself helped me to identify and be recognized for my passion, the idea of talent may have held me back.

I'd had attention for writing as a child and teen, and that talent drove me to keep impressing so I didn't lose the one thing that, amid the insults and fistfights, made me feel special. As a middle schooler, my body started reacting to the bullying for me. I dreaded the bus, the cafeteria, the classrooms, and when the stress got too bad, my body produced a fever like a rabbit from a hat. I went home. I wrote.

My youth was my selling point and, like a desperate fashion model, I was determined to cash in before my moneymaker checked out. I felt like it wouldn't be as "impressive" to publish as a bona fide adult. I didn't think I would ever be great, but I didn't just want to be good.

So I wanted to be special instead. S.E. Hinton special. Christopher Paolini special. (Except, you know, continue publishing.)

Talent isn't the end-all-be-all of "making it". After all, every one of us can think of at least five people who are famous despite being talent-less at their chosen field. There's no formula to getting published, though some combination of the following elements is usually quoted in the result:

  • Talent
  • Hard work
  • Dedication
  • Skill (gaining/improving)
  • Luck
  • Connections
  • Timing
  • Blood
  • Sweat
  • Tears
  • Coffee

At BaltiCon 2012, +Dave Robison of The Roundtable Podcast interviewed the podcasters, begging the question "Does Talent Matter?" Here's a link to that excellent episode. Few of the responses gave an outright "no"--most people were quick to point out that talent might give writers an extra boost, but needed a lot of elbow-grease to develop it into something like skill. One interesting comment, however, indicated that the perception of "talent" may very well hold writers back.

Talent!? How can talent hold you back?

Let's return to high school-aged Scribe. I went to a small, nerdy high school that had just opened, and almost everyone who went there was a geek. It was a godsend. For the first time since moving to North Carolina, I didn't get bullied. I made friends--the best friends of my life. Friends who are still with me today (shout out to the Ladies Pendragon). Finally, the shackles of depression and CONSTANT VIGILANCE were falling away. In this new, safe atmosphere my writing flourished. I dreamed up new worlds and characters with my friends. I found my target audience. I expanded to fit my own skin, giving life to the construct that had been holding my place until it was safe to come out.

I studied grammar fiercely and felt secure in my talent as a writer, lavishing in the descriptions of the worlds I wanted readers to see and love as I did. When I was seventeen, I sat down and decided I was going to start My First Novel. Unlike the other times I'd written a couple of scenes, I swore to finish this one.

Three and a half years later, I did. I was in college at this point and started researching agents. I realized my story was far longer than the projected 100k average for fantasy novels. Mine was 150k.

Whatever. I was a good writer for my age. I hacked my book down to 130k and sent off a query. A few weeks later I got a full manuscript request.

Ecstatic, I printed and shipped the manuscript (this was, believe it or not, before most agents accepted emailed files) and dashed down to my local coffee-shop to wave the yellow request slip in front of my writing club and jump up-and-down like a Took on a sugar-high.

Secretly, I thought my youth would still be impressive. Though I was already 22, I was still at university. I still had this delusion that I was a precocious child and my youth was the selling point  rather than my skill.

A few weeks later, I got a rejection. It was a form, with a little check mark, and a neat cursive message:

The writing is nice, but the story is too long and slow.

I was annoyed. It was a good story. And it was way shorter and faster than other stories I'd read. AND I WAS TALENTED! After the initial despair, I realized my mistake had been relying on my talent--or my perception of myself as talented--to make up for whatever my writing lacked. Luckily, I had learned two excellent things from that rejection.
  • The prose itself was decent (though not amazing enough to carry a slower start like Tad Williams or Jacqueline Carey)
  • Talent and passion had let me coast this far, but if I wanted to get published, I needed to start pedaling.

I was annoyed at myself. If I hadn't been so convinced my talent and youth would get me published, I might have started learning mechanics sooner, started working on how to make my sentences clear and precise, my story structure logical, and my pacing on point. I'd wasted too much time trusting in my +5 Armor of Talent long after the battle against bullies was over. I had failed to hone my skills enough to be comfortable taking that "talent" armor off.

Does talent matter?

Yes, it mattered when I was young, but not because it meant I was a good writer: because it meant I had a goal to look forward to when I couldn't stand being inside my own skin. Something to be better at than other people. Part way through eighth grade, when a horrific family event caused me to lose both my best friend and my sense of personal safety, I finally did shut down. I went through class in a daze. I didn't do homework. I didn't see friends. I woke up in the middle of the night and sat on the couch, crying. I thought I was going crazy.

Then, one of my tormentors (who had somehow become friends with my brother) found out and used the worst trauma of my life to ridicule me in front of the entire cafeteria. I hurled my unopened milk at him and stormed out of the cafeteria, past the front desk, and out the front doors, crying so hard I couldn't breathe. I didn't want to be there anymore. I hated that school and I hated what it had made me become. I hated how weak I was and how broken my world felt, how quickly I cried and how often.

My seventh-grade math teacher, (an ex-football player and also a Mr. P) had been overseeing the cafeteria. He'd borrowed my notebook full of stories and drawings the year before, and despite my lackluster grades in math, encouraged me to keep writing and even found a contest for me to submit to. I was almost to the school's front stairs--stairs I'd been shoved down the year before by a kid on my bus--when he stopped me.

"You're going to be a writer," he said.

Tears rolling down my face, I didn't respond to him. I knew what he was afraid of. I've never considered suicide, and I wasn't considering it then; I just wanted out. I went with him to the guidance counselor. They called my mom, who came to pick me up. Before I left, he reminded me again that I was a talented writer, and that was something no one could take away.

Does talent matter?

No. It stopped mattering after that first big rejection, when I realized talent alone would never be enough to get me published. I had to stop thinking about it, or I wouldn't be able to move forward with my work. I wouldn't be able to accept the criticism I needed to improve if I didn't let down the shields a little. I'd always been good at accepting line-notes, but the ideas themselves? I'd never considered those open-season.

I'd constructed my entire identity around writing, down to my nickname: Scribe. It wasn't all I had, but it defined who I was. But my love of writing was deeper than the superficial idea that my talent for it could somehow protect me, somehow make people like and respect me. I love writing because I love the part of myself that creates stories. I love the part of me that can put words on a page and evoke images, create emotion, make it matter. That has nothing to do with talent.

Does talent matter?

Maybe. Now, at 28, I'm too old to be special if I get published. I'm not a prodigy. I'm not even sure I'm talented anymore because I still have this notion that "talent" somehow drives success, and if I'm not successful by now despite all the hard work I've put in since that rejection, I must not be talented. I know that's not true, but getting myself to believe it is sometimes hard, especially when I'm at the bottom of the hill, looking up.

It's a load of crap, really. I don't want to be special because I'm young, or talented "for my age", because that indicates there are insufficiencies elsewhere that people are willing to overlook because I'm not a writer in full blossom yet.

I want to be special because I'm a good writer, and because my stories have meant something to the people who read them. I'm not young anymore, and if I'm not talented I'll just have to work harder to become skilled.

This has not been an easy post to write, but I feel it's an important one. I love writing. I love it enough to let go of my out-dated ideas of talent and what it says about my future, my dreams, and myself.

Do you think talent matters? Why or why not? How has the idea of talent (and having or not having it) affected you as a writer or artist?

**Pictures from American Girl wiki, dosomething.org, and the ilovecharts

8 comments:

Rebekkah Niles said...

I agree with the thought that talent can hold you back--if you let it.

Why? Because it stops you from having to struggle. When something comes easily, when a person is natural at it, they have two choices: work hard to get even better, or enjoy the fact that they're already good and never improve. I see the latter more often. It's the easier. Struggle is hard.

For the people who have passion for their talent, talent isn't a handicap. But, in my experience, these people are rare. I've seen lots of talented people move on to do something else as soon as someone else became better than them, as soon as they had to work for it (which means to me it was never their passion, only their pride). And I've seen lots of others realize they loved something else instead, pursuing something harder for them because that's where their passions were. I've only seen a few whose passion is their talent (congrats on being one of the few! ;). I think, to me, passion and perseverance supersede talent.

Or maybe that's just because I've never thought of myself as talented. I always thought my friends were better than I was, so 'proving myself' was never even an option. There was always someone better than me in everything, someone different for every subject, but always someone, and that to me meant I wasn't anything special.

I began writing in middle school because my friends were doing it, and then I realized loved it. I knew at the time that there were better writers than me. But I kept writing, and promised myself that everything I wrote would be practice for the next. I'd like to think I became a good writer, not because of talent, but because of passion. Because maybe I did have talent, but I certainly never felt like I did.

ekcarmel said...

I think talent is like a catalyst, the push needed to send someone in a specific direction. A person can go a long way on talent but also needs to put in the time and effort to push it further to learn more and get better.

I'm partway through The Talent Code by Daniel Coyle, which is why your tweet caught my attention. The book discusses a neurological basis for talent, but also that combining specific types of practice, motivation, and coaching take it beyond talent to actual skill.

My point in all this is that I agree with you wholeheartedly. Talent is a beginning. From what I can see, you are working hard now and that's what's important. Don't think the time you didn't work as hard on your talent was wasted. You were still learning, though maybe just other things. It's all valuable.

I heard you on the Roundtable Podcast and I thought your novel ideas sounded amazing - good luck!

Abigail Hilton said...

Good post. I don't think you're actually doing anything wrong. Your experience sounds a lot like mine, except that the destructive pressures on you and I as children were completely different. You should not consider your experiences with traditional publishing in a vacuum. Those experiences happened against the backdrop of the greatest upheaval in the industry since Gutenberg.

"Talent" is subjective. You've got to decide who's opinion of your talent matters to you and how much it matters.

I decided a while back that a traditional editor's opinion of my talent is not critical and certainly not worth large amounts of money in lost royalties. I've been very happy accepting the opinions of thousands of readers.

Which, I know, makes me sound like an indie snob, and I don't mean to be. I also don't mean to imply that all books are best-suited to indie publishing. They're not. (But thank Thor mine are, because *I* am not well-suited to trad pub.)

I'm just saying - your books aren't dead because a trad publisher has not deigned to lock you into a contract. Your books are alive and waiting for their moment...like little golden foxes in a crate! :)

Lauren Harris said...

Thank you all for your thoughtful comments. Putting all this out there was freeing, in a way, and knowing that other people have had similar or complimentary experiences helps deepen the sense that letting go of my own concept of talent was the right decision.

Becky, I'm flattered to be counted among those you see as having both talent and passion. I'm really glad you love writing so much, even if you've never let me READ any of it (*hint*). You've got a ton of drive and a lot more nerve than I had--you saved money so you could take a six-month sabbatical and write! That takes a pair of mithral ovaries right there.

ekcarmel - I'm going to have to find that book now. It sounds fascinating, and might help me as I try to let go of the threads of the concept that are still holding me back. I've mostly forgiven myself for wasted time, it's just a bit of a bummer. I'm glad you liked the sound of my novel on RTP! I'm seven chapters in at the moment, and the outline is morphing a lot due to that discussion.

Abbie - Yes, I've taken into account the upheaval in the industry at the time, though it was 2005 or 2006 when I got that rejection, so it wasn't quite as bad as it is now. I have a few works I am planning to self-publish under a pseudonym because I feel they're more suited to that market (novellas are hard to sell anywhere), but I'm still gunning for traditional for my novels, because I think they do suit that form of publishing.

I mean, I don't write about foxes anymore, unlike SOME people <3.

But every time I send a query now, I'm going to text you "The golden fox has left the crate."

Emily Lavin Leverett said...

This is such a moving post. I've thought about talent, but in a very different direction, since I've mostly believed I didn't have particularly much. I was good at English, and I loved it, so I went into the field. I wrote some when I was younger (teenager) but I figured everyone did. I didn't decide I actually wanted to write "for serious" until I was your age (28). I've never thought I was particularly hard working, either, though I've lately come to the conclusion that I am. Mostly, I just figured I was average (okay, a little better, but everyone in America thinks they're above average!).

But it never occured to me that I had talent or that I should be succesful for it. :) Talent was an elusive thing that other folks had, that I could see on them, like sun shining on a mirrored building.

I do totally understand your "I must not be talented b/c talent = success" feeling. That's a hard one to shake, too. If I knew how, I'd write a book and be a gazillionaire. :)

wolfshade said...

You are a good writer and a good person. It doesn't matter where you fall on the bell curve of "1st publication age" when compared to the actual quality of the stories you write in your lifetime. Keep writing. Explore ideas. The rest will happen.

Lauren Harris said...

Emily: Thanks for reading the post. :) It's really interesting to see how others have seen themselves with respect to talent, and how that has shaped and affected each person growing up. I know a lot of people who thought they were average, or even "not very good", but who are absolutely amazing at what they want to do. Often, lack of audacity holds those people back. I'm glad you were able to push through your perceived "average-ness" and love writing anyway. :)

Wolfshade: Thanks. <3

Samantha Hircock said...

You know, it's funny... I found this site, this story, by googling "does talent matter" because I was wondering for myself.

I have been accused of having an abundance of talent. I’m a singer, musician, poet, photographer, artist, and the list goes on. I always saw those things as skills; skills that I developed through time spent alone. Then, one day… there I was with people loving my “talent” and making jokes about how I’m “perfect” because I can learn anything. Yet, I’m somehow not famous. I think whenever I do wish I could be famous, or rather successful, that it comes eternally back to the fact that it’s really not about talent. I think of those talentless people with undeserved fame and I know that it was their connections, or whatever little door they managed to squeeze their foot into that got them there. Then, I look around. Today, there’s no one here to even mock my “perfection” or to tell me how great I am. There’s not even anyone to smack me upside the head when I put myself down. I’m alone again at this current juncture of my life. I’ve put out throngs of effort trying meet people who I could connect with here, ones like the people I met in my AmeriCorps year, but between obligations of work and school there’s really no time to network and nothing goes anywhere. It’s very ironic that loneliness made these talents and loneliness will surely make them better, but all the skill in the world won’t give me an audience. It has made me think. I’m not calling myself a genius, but I’ve really realized there are probably thousands of brilliant people out there whose “talents” go on in the respective dungeons of “going through the motions” and surviving. A waitress in the low part of town where there’s no theater and no body walking the streets who would know what they were hearing if she started reciting the words of Hamlet isn’t going anywhere without the luck of a handshake or a leaflet of a chance getting blown by the wind onto the sidewalk she travels. It’s who you know; it’s up to the audience whether talent matters because only the audience can carry it.

Best of luck to us all, I say. Leave my "talent", I wish I could crusade for all the unknowns and be famous for bringing fame to them.